Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Boston, MA vs Tulsa, OK

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Boston spends 1277.1% more per capita than Tulsa ($67,048/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Boston, MA
Pop. 665,945
C
56/100
Budget Balance25
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Tulsa, OK
Pop. 411,938
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Boston
Tulsa
Total Spending
$48.1B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$72,299
$5,250
Total Revenue
$20.8B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$31,243
$0
Total Debt
$296.3M
$0
Debt / Capita
$445
$0
Population
665,945
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Boston$0
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
Boston$1,107
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
Boston$594
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
Boston$711
Tulsa$154
Education
Boston$30,742
Tulsa$0
Health
Boston$725
Tulsa$762

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

BostonTulsa
Sales Tax
$78
$97
Intergovernmental
$5,357
$0
Charges & Fees
$2,784
$0
Other
$4,557
$53

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

BostonTulsa
Police
$0
$628
Fire Protection
$1,107
$196
Highways & Roads
$594
$257
Education
$30,742
$0
Public Welfare
$1,110
$86
Health
$725
$762
Hospitals
$2,584
$0
Parks & Recreation
$711
$154
Housing
$6,614
$350
Sewerage
$355
$27
Utilities
$3,402
$41
General Admin
$5,401
$0
Other
$18,955
$2,748
C
Boston, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities