Tulsa, OK vs Albuquerque, NM
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Albuquerque, NM outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $17,237 versus $5,250, a 228% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Albuquerque, NM holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 81/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Albuquerque, NM carries $613 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Albuquerque, NM leads with parks and recreation at $1,990.
Summary
Albuquerque spends 69.5% more per capita than Tulsa ($11,987/person difference). Albuquerque, NM has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 81/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $36 |
| Sales Tax | $97 | $355 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,580 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $1,897 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,633 |
| Other | $53 | $2,174 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $440 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $172 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $419 |
| Health | $762 | $291 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $328 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $1,990 |
| Housing | $350 | $4,080 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $0 |
| Utilities | $41 | $5,212 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,096 |
| Other | $2,748 | $3,209 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.