Albuquerque, NM vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Albuquerque, NM outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $17,237 versus $5,250, a 228% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Albuquerque, NM holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 81/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Albuquerque, NM carries $613 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Albuquerque, NM leads with parks and recreation at $1,990 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Albuquerque spends 228.3% more per capita than Tulsa ($11,987/person difference). Albuquerque, NM has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 81/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $36 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $355 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $1,580 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,897 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,633 | $0 |
| Other | $2,174 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $440 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $172 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $419 | $86 |
| Health | $291 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $328 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,990 | $154 |
| Housing | $4,080 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $27 |
| Utilities | $5,212 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,096 | $0 |
| Other | $3,209 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.