Tucson, AZ vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Francisco spends 91.4% more per capita than Tucson ($168,372/person difference). Tucson, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 55/100).
Fiscal Health Score
C
55/100
Budget Balance71
Debt Burden10
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
D
48/100
Budget Balance70
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Tucson
San Francisco
Total Spending
$8.5B
$156.7B
Spending / Capita
$15,759
$184,131
Total Revenue
$12.6B
$232.3B
Revenue / Capita
$23,276
$272,907
Total Debt
$833.1M
$1.7B
Debt / Capita
$1,540
$2,031
Population
541,033
851,036
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Tucson$0
San Francisco$3,351
Fire Protection
Tucson$330
San Francisco$2,281
Parks & Recreation
Tucson$1,229
San Francisco$4,119
Health
Tucson$0
San Francisco$1,911
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
TucsonSan Francisco
| Property Tax | $5 | $148 |
| Sales Tax | $309 | $3,028 |
| Income Tax | $1,107 | $269 |
| Intergovernmental | $23,276 | $19,762 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,534 | $7,961 |
| Other | $952 | $18,918 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
TucsonSan Francisco
| Police | $0 | $3,351 |
| Fire Protection | $330 | $2,281 |
| Public Welfare | $1,181 | $2,203 |
| Health | $0 | $1,911 |
| Hospitals | $1,314 | $6,939 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,229 | $4,119 |
| Housing | $3,091 | $9,315 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $1,423 |
| Utilities | $3,555 | $21,190 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,735 | $22,798 |
| General Admin | $0 | $14,899 |
| Other | $3,322 | $93,702 |
C
Tucson, AZ
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health
D
San Francisco, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 48/100
Below average fiscal health