San Francisco, CA vs Tucson, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Francisco spends 1068.4% more per capita than Tucson ($168,372/person difference). Tucson, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 55/100).
Fiscal Health Score
D
48/100
Budget Balance70
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
C
55/100
Budget Balance71
Debt Burden10
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
San Francisco
Tucson
Total Spending
$156.7B
$8.5B
Spending / Capita
$184,131
$15,759
Total Revenue
$232.3B
$12.6B
Revenue / Capita
$272,907
$23,276
Total Debt
$1.7B
$833.1M
Debt / Capita
$2,031
$1,540
Population
851,036
541,033
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
San Francisco$3,351
Tucson$0
Fire Protection
San Francisco$2,281
Tucson$330
Parks & Recreation
San Francisco$4,119
Tucson$1,229
Health
San Francisco$1,911
Tucson$0
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoTucson
| Property Tax | $148 | $5 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $309 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $1,107 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $23,276 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $4,534 |
| Other | $18,918 | $952 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoTucson
| Police | $3,351 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $330 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $1,181 |
| Health | $1,911 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $1,314 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $1,229 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $3,091 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $0 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $3,555 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $1,735 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $3,322 |
D
San Francisco, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 48/100
Below average fiscal health
C
Tucson, AZ
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health