Tucson, AZ vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Tucson, AZ spends 41% more per resident than Omaha, NE: $15,759 against $11,180. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 55/100 (grade C) for Tucson, AZ — a 35-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Tucson, AZ carries $1,540 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Tucson, AZ at $1,229 per resident and in Omaha, NE at $742.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Tucson, AZ at 100% of total revenue, whereas Omaha, NE relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Tucson spends 41.0% more per capita than Omaha ($4,579/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $5 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $309 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $1,107 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $23,276 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,534 | $0 |
| Other | $952 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $330 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $1,181 | $1,521 |
| Health | $0 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $1,314 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,229 | $742 |
| Housing | $3,091 | $3,045 |
| Utilities | $3,555 | $581 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,735 | $0 |
| Other | $3,322 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.