Omaha, NE vs Tucson, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Tucson spends 29.1% more per capita than Omaha ($4,579/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
C
55/100
Budget Balance71
Debt Burden10
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Omaha
Tucson
Total Spending
$5.5B
$8.5B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$15,759
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$12.6B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$23,276
Total Debt
$0
$833.1M
Debt / Capita
$0
$1,540
Population
489,201
541,033
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Tucson$330
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Tucson$0
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Tucson$1,229
Health
Omaha$456
Tucson$0
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaTucson
| Property Tax | $624 | $5 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $309 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,107 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $23,276 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,534 |
| Other | $4,672 | $952 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaTucson
| Fire Protection | $0 | $330 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $1,181 |
| Health | $456 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,314 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $1,229 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $3,091 |
| Utilities | $581 | $3,555 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,735 |
| Other | $4,516 | $3,322 |
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Tucson, AZ
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health