Tucson, AZ vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN spends 39% more per resident than Tucson, AZ: $21,910 against $15,759. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Minneapolis, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 55/100 (grade C) for Tucson, AZ — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $1,540 for Tucson, AZ. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Tucson, AZ at $1,229 per resident and in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Tucson, AZ at 100% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 28.1% more per capita than Tucson ($6,151/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $5 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $309 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $1,107 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $23,276 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,534 | $2,040 |
| Other | $952 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $330 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $1,181 | $1,500 |
| Hospitals | $1,314 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,229 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $3,091 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $570 |
| Utilities | $3,555 | $2,398 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,735 | $0 |
| Other | $3,322 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.