Minneapolis, MN vs Tucson, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN spends 39% more per resident than Tucson, AZ: $21,910 against $15,759. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Minneapolis, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 55/100 (grade C) for Tucson, AZ — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $1,540 for Tucson, AZ. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486 per resident and in Tucson, AZ at $1,229.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Minneapolis, MN at 17% of total revenue, whereas Tucson, AZ relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 39.0% more per capita than Tucson ($6,151/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $5 |
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $309 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $1,107 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $23,276 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $4,534 |
| Other | $3,254 | $952 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $683 | $330 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $1,181 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,314 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $1,229 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $3,091 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $3,555 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,735 |
| Other | $8,919 | $3,322 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.