Toms River, NJ vs Newark, NJ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Newark, NJ outspends Toms River, NJ by a wide margin per resident — $20,014 versus $9,931, a 102% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Toms River, NJ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 54/100 (grade C) for Newark, NJ — a 36-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Toms River, NJ reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Newark, NJ carries $236 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Toms River, NJ leads with parks and recreation at $606 per resident, while Newark, NJ leads with highways and roads at $578.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 30% of total revenue in Toms River, NJ and 51% in Newark, NJ.
Summary
Newark spends 50.4% more per capita than Toms River ($10,083/person difference). Toms River, NJ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $2 | $34 |
| Sales Tax | $439 | $8 |
| Income Tax | $26 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,838 | $2,457 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $1,848 |
| Other | $2,872 | $2,165 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $277 | $414 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $578 |
| Public Welfare | $324 | $609 |
| Health | $0 | $340 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $5,702 |
| Parks & Recreation | $606 | $350 |
| Housing | $2,899 | $5,110 |
| Sewerage | $363 | $113 |
| Utilities | $1,122 | $2,504 |
| Other | $4,339 | $4,295 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.