Newark, NJ vs Toms River, NJ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Newark, NJ outspends Toms River, NJ by a wide margin per resident — $20,014 versus $9,931, a 102% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Toms River, NJ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 54/100 (grade C) for Newark, NJ — a 36-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Toms River, NJ reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Newark, NJ carries $236 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Newark, NJ leads with highways and roads at $578 per resident, while Toms River, NJ leads with parks and recreation at $606.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 51% of total revenue in Newark, NJ and 30% in Toms River, NJ.
Summary
Newark spends 101.5% more per capita than Toms River ($10,083/person difference). Toms River, NJ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $34 | $2 |
| Sales Tax | $8 | $439 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $26 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,457 | $3,838 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,848 | $0 |
| Other | $2,165 | $2,872 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $414 | $277 |
| Highways & Roads | $578 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $609 | $324 |
| Health | $340 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $5,702 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $350 | $606 |
| Housing | $5,110 | $2,899 |
| Sewerage | $113 | $363 |
| Utilities | $2,504 | $1,122 |
| Other | $4,295 | $4,339 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.