Tacoma, WA vs Spokane Valley, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Tacoma, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $23,896 versus $5,097, a 369% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA edges Tacoma, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 68/100 (grade B) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $1,835 for Tacoma, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tacoma, WA leads with education at $1,396 per resident, while Spokane Valley, WA leads with parks and recreation at $259.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Tacoma, WA at 20% of total revenue, whereas Spokane Valley, WA relies most on other revenue at 34%.
Summary
Tacoma spends 368.8% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($18,798/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $131 | $201 |
| Sales Tax | $789 | $17 |
| Income Tax | $3,984 | $26 |
| Intergovernmental | $17,186 | $100 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,236 | $0 |
| Other | $6,696 | $421 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $169 |
| Fire Protection | $1,153 | $189 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $112 |
| Education | $1,396 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,807 | $784 |
| Health | $283 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $396 | $221 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,048 | $259 |
| Housing | $4,805 | $2,595 |
| Sewerage | $798 | $43 |
| Utilities | $5,418 | $31 |
| Other | $6,793 | $695 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.