Spokane Valley, WA vs Tacoma, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Tacoma, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $23,896 versus $5,097, a 369% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA edges Tacoma, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 68/100 (grade B) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $1,835 for Tacoma, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Spokane Valley, WA leads with parks and recreation at $259 per resident, while Tacoma, WA leads with education at $1,396.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Spokane Valley, WA at 34% of total revenue, whereas Tacoma, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 20%.
Summary
Tacoma spends 78.7% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($18,798/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $201 | $131 |
| Sales Tax | $17 | $789 |
| Income Tax | $26 | $3,984 |
| Intergovernmental | $100 | $17,186 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $5,236 |
| Other | $421 | $6,696 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $169 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $189 | $1,153 |
| Highways & Roads | $112 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,396 |
| Public Welfare | $784 | $1,807 |
| Health | $0 | $283 |
| Hospitals | $221 | $396 |
| Parks & Recreation | $259 | $1,048 |
| Housing | $2,595 | $4,805 |
| Sewerage | $43 | $798 |
| Utilities | $31 | $5,418 |
| Other | $695 | $6,793 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.