Tacoma, WA vs Everett, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA and Tacoma, WA spend within 10.7% of each other per resident — $26,447 versus $23,896 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Everett, WA edges Tacoma, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 67/100 (grade B) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Everett, WA carries the lighter load at $141 per resident versus $1,835 for Tacoma, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tacoma, WA leads with education at $1,396 per resident, while Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Tacoma, WA at 20% of total revenue, whereas Everett, WA relies most on other revenue at 24%.
Summary
Everett spends 9.6% more per capita than Tacoma ($2,552/person difference). Everett, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $131 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $789 | $362 |
| Income Tax | $3,984 | $235 |
| Intergovernmental | $17,186 | $4,248 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,236 | $4,469 |
| Other | $6,696 | $6,125 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $290 |
| Fire Protection | $1,153 | $1,790 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $251 |
| Education | $1,396 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,807 | $714 |
| Health | $283 | $379 |
| Hospitals | $396 | $284 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,048 | $1,098 |
| Housing | $4,805 | $3,492 |
| Sewerage | $798 | $268 |
| Utilities | $5,418 | $6,827 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,198 |
| Other | $6,793 | $8,856 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.