Everett, WA vs Tacoma, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA and Tacoma, WA spend within 10.7% of each other per resident — $26,447 versus $23,896 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Everett, WA edges Tacoma, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 67/100 (grade B) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Everett, WA carries the lighter load at $141 per resident versus $1,835 for Tacoma, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790 per resident, while Tacoma, WA leads with education at $1,396.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Everett, WA at 24% of total revenue, whereas Tacoma, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 20%.
Summary
Everett spends 10.7% more per capita than Tacoma ($2,552/person difference). Everett, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $131 |
| Sales Tax | $362 | $789 |
| Income Tax | $235 | $3,984 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,248 | $17,186 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,469 | $5,236 |
| Other | $6,125 | $6,696 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $290 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,790 | $1,153 |
| Highways & Roads | $251 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,396 |
| Public Welfare | $714 | $1,807 |
| Health | $379 | $283 |
| Hospitals | $284 | $396 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,098 | $1,048 |
| Housing | $3,492 | $4,805 |
| Sewerage | $268 | $798 |
| Utilities | $6,827 | $5,418 |
| Interest on Debt | $2,198 | $0 |
| Other | $8,856 | $6,793 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.