St. George, UT vs Layton, UT
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
St. George, UT outspends Layton, UT by a wide margin per resident — $12,862 versus $8,008, a 61% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
St. George, UT edges Layton, UT on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 62/100 (grade C) to 55/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, St. George, UT carries the lighter load at $14 per resident versus $238 for Layton, UT. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in St. George, UT at $2,093 per resident and in Layton, UT at $799.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in St. George, UT at 100% of total revenue, whereas Layton, UT relies most on other revenue at 4358%.
Summary
St. George spends 60.6% more per capita than Layton ($4,854/person difference). St. George, UT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $2 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $1,485 | $91 |
| Income Tax | $848 | $606 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,539 | $67 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,377 | $1,740 |
| Other | $3,654 | $2,929 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $259 | $68 |
| Highways & Roads | $157 | $71 |
| Education | $46 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $392 | $627 |
| Hospitals | $72 | $300 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,093 | $799 |
| Housing | $1,989 | $2,252 |
| Sewerage | $391 | $58 |
| Utilities | $2,612 | $1,194 |
| Interest on Debt | $282 | $0 |
| Other | $4,569 | $2,639 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.