Layton, UT vs St. George, UT
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
St. George, UT outspends Layton, UT by a wide margin per resident — $12,862 versus $8,008, a 61% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
St. George, UT edges Layton, UT on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 62/100 (grade C) to 55/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, St. George, UT carries the lighter load at $14 per resident versus $238 for Layton, UT. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Layton, UT at $799 per resident and in St. George, UT at $2,093.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Layton, UT at 4358% of total revenue, whereas St. George, UT relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
St. George spends 37.7% more per capita than Layton ($4,854/person difference). St. George, UT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $2 |
| Sales Tax | $91 | $1,485 |
| Income Tax | $606 | $848 |
| Intergovernmental | $67 | $9,539 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,740 | $3,377 |
| Other | $2,929 | $3,654 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $68 | $259 |
| Highways & Roads | $71 | $157 |
| Education | $0 | $46 |
| Public Welfare | $627 | $392 |
| Hospitals | $300 | $72 |
| Parks & Recreation | $799 | $2,093 |
| Housing | $2,252 | $1,989 |
| Sewerage | $58 | $391 |
| Utilities | $1,194 | $2,612 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $282 |
| Other | $2,639 | $4,569 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.