Springfield, OR vs Portland, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Portland, OR outspends Springfield, OR by a wide margin per resident — $23,675 versus $12,624, a 88% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Portland, OR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 63/100 (grade C) against 55/100 (grade C) for Springfield, OR — a 8-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Springfield, OR carries the lighter load at $23 per resident versus $1,574 for Portland, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Springfield, OR leads with fire protection at $393 per resident, while Portland, OR leads with parks and recreation at $2,477.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Springfield, OR at 194% of total revenue, whereas Portland, OR relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 19%.
Summary
Portland spends 46.7% more per capita than Springfield ($11,051/person difference). Portland, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $44 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $1,695 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $130 |
| Intergovernmental | $364 | $8,979 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,497 | $3,883 |
| Other | $13,347 | $7,916 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $393 | $1,700 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $139 |
| Public Welfare | $1,098 | $3,607 |
| Health | $375 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $181 | $2,893 |
| Parks & Recreation | $0 | $2,477 |
| Housing | $3,952 | $3,694 |
| Sewerage | $236 | $630 |
| Utilities | $1,394 | $1,845 |
| Other | $4,994 | $6,689 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.