Portland, OR vs Springfield, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Portland, OR outspends Springfield, OR by a wide margin per resident — $23,675 versus $12,624, a 88% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Portland, OR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 63/100 (grade C) against 55/100 (grade C) for Springfield, OR — a 8-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Springfield, OR carries the lighter load at $23 per resident versus $1,574 for Portland, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Portland, OR leads with parks and recreation at $2,477 per resident, while Springfield, OR leads with fire protection at $393.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Portland, OR at 19% of total revenue, whereas Springfield, OR relies most on other revenue at 194%.
Summary
Portland spends 87.5% more per capita than Springfield ($11,051/person difference). Portland, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $44 |
| Sales Tax | $1,695 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $130 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $8,979 | $364 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,883 | $2,497 |
| Other | $7,916 | $13,347 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,700 | $393 |
| Highways & Roads | $139 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,607 | $1,098 |
| Health | $0 | $375 |
| Hospitals | $2,893 | $181 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,477 | $0 |
| Housing | $3,694 | $3,952 |
| Sewerage | $630 | $236 |
| Utilities | $1,845 | $1,394 |
| Other | $6,689 | $4,994 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.