Spokane, WA vs Spokane Valley, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Spokane, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $16,224 versus $5,097, a 218% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane, WA edges Spokane Valley, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 70/100 (grade B) to 68/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Spokane, WA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Spokane Valley, WA carries $5 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Spokane, WA leads with police at $2,475 per resident, while Spokane Valley, WA leads with parks and recreation at $259.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Spokane, WA at 38% of total revenue, whereas Spokane Valley, WA relies most on other revenue at 34%.
Summary
Spokane spends 218.3% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($11,126/person difference). Spokane, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $133 | $201 |
| Sales Tax | $359 | $17 |
| Income Tax | $724 | $26 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,005 | $100 |
| Other | $3,063 | $421 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,475 | $169 |
| Fire Protection | $1,057 | $189 |
| Highways & Roads | $298 | $112 |
| Public Welfare | $1,657 | $784 |
| Health | $8 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $224 | $221 |
| Parks & Recreation | $446 | $259 |
| Housing | $2,512 | $2,595 |
| Sewerage | $200 | $43 |
| Utilities | $1,624 | $31 |
| Other | $5,722 | $695 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.