Spokane Valley, WA vs Spokane, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Spokane, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $16,224 versus $5,097, a 218% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane, WA edges Spokane Valley, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 70/100 (grade B) to 68/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Spokane, WA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Spokane Valley, WA carries $5 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Spokane Valley, WA leads with parks and recreation at $259 per resident, while Spokane, WA leads with police at $2,475.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Spokane Valley, WA at 34% of total revenue, whereas Spokane, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 38%.
Summary
Spokane spends 68.6% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($11,126/person difference). Spokane, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $201 | $133 |
| Sales Tax | $17 | $359 |
| Income Tax | $26 | $724 |
| Intergovernmental | $100 | $5,005 |
| Other | $421 | $3,063 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $169 | $2,475 |
| Fire Protection | $189 | $1,057 |
| Highways & Roads | $112 | $298 |
| Public Welfare | $784 | $1,657 |
| Health | $0 | $8 |
| Hospitals | $221 | $224 |
| Parks & Recreation | $259 | $446 |
| Housing | $2,595 | $2,512 |
| Sewerage | $43 | $200 |
| Utilities | $31 | $1,624 |
| Other | $695 | $5,722 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.