Spokane, WA vs Everett, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA outspends Spokane, WA by a wide margin per resident — $26,447 versus $16,224, a 63% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane, WA edges Everett, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 70/100 (grade B) to 67/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Spokane, WA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Everett, WA carries $141 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Spokane, WA leads with police at $2,475 per resident, while Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Spokane, WA at 38% of total revenue, whereas Everett, WA relies most on other revenue at 24%.
Summary
Everett spends 38.7% more per capita than Spokane ($10,224/person difference). Spokane, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $133 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $359 | $362 |
| Income Tax | $724 | $235 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,005 | $4,248 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,469 |
| Other | $3,063 | $6,125 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,475 | $290 |
| Fire Protection | $1,057 | $1,790 |
| Highways & Roads | $298 | $251 |
| Public Welfare | $1,657 | $714 |
| Health | $8 | $379 |
| Hospitals | $224 | $284 |
| Parks & Recreation | $446 | $1,098 |
| Housing | $2,512 | $3,492 |
| Sewerage | $200 | $268 |
| Utilities | $1,624 | $6,827 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,198 |
| Other | $5,722 | $8,856 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.