Everett, WA vs Spokane, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA outspends Spokane, WA by a wide margin per resident — $26,447 versus $16,224, a 63% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane, WA edges Everett, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 70/100 (grade B) to 67/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Spokane, WA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Everett, WA carries $141 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790 per resident, while Spokane, WA leads with police at $2,475.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Everett, WA at 24% of total revenue, whereas Spokane, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 38%.
Summary
Everett spends 63.0% more per capita than Spokane ($10,224/person difference). Spokane, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $133 |
| Sales Tax | $362 | $359 |
| Income Tax | $235 | $724 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,248 | $5,005 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,469 | $0 |
| Other | $6,125 | $3,063 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $290 | $2,475 |
| Fire Protection | $1,790 | $1,057 |
| Highways & Roads | $251 | $298 |
| Public Welfare | $714 | $1,657 |
| Health | $379 | $8 |
| Hospitals | $284 | $224 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,098 | $446 |
| Housing | $3,492 | $2,512 |
| Sewerage | $268 | $200 |
| Utilities | $6,827 | $1,624 |
| Interest on Debt | $2,198 | $0 |
| Other | $8,856 | $5,722 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.