Spokane Valley, WA vs Everett, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $26,447 versus $5,097, a 419% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA edges Everett, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 68/100 (grade B) to 67/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $141 for Everett, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Spokane Valley, WA leads with parks and recreation at $259 per resident, while Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 34% of total revenue in Spokane Valley, WA and 24% in Everett, WA.
Summary
Everett spends 80.7% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($21,350/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $201 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $17 | $362 |
| Income Tax | $26 | $235 |
| Intergovernmental | $100 | $4,248 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,469 |
| Other | $421 | $6,125 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $169 | $290 |
| Fire Protection | $189 | $1,790 |
| Highways & Roads | $112 | $251 |
| Public Welfare | $784 | $714 |
| Health | $0 | $379 |
| Hospitals | $221 | $284 |
| Parks & Recreation | $259 | $1,098 |
| Housing | $2,595 | $3,492 |
| Sewerage | $43 | $268 |
| Utilities | $31 | $6,827 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,198 |
| Other | $695 | $8,856 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.