Everett, WA vs Spokane Valley, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $26,447 versus $5,097, a 419% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA edges Everett, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 68/100 (grade B) to 67/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $141 for Everett, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790 per resident, while Spokane Valley, WA leads with parks and recreation at $259.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 24% of total revenue in Everett, WA and 34% in Spokane Valley, WA.
Summary
Everett spends 418.8% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($21,350/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $201 |
| Sales Tax | $362 | $17 |
| Income Tax | $235 | $26 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,248 | $100 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,469 | $0 |
| Other | $6,125 | $421 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $290 | $169 |
| Fire Protection | $1,790 | $189 |
| Highways & Roads | $251 | $112 |
| Public Welfare | $714 | $784 |
| Health | $379 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $284 | $221 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,098 | $259 |
| Housing | $3,492 | $2,595 |
| Sewerage | $268 | $43 |
| Utilities | $6,827 | $31 |
| Interest on Debt | $2,198 | $0 |
| Other | $8,856 | $695 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.