Spokane Valley, WA vs Bellevue, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Bellevue, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $22,065 versus $5,097, a 333% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 68/100 (grade B) against 55/100 (grade C) for Bellevue, WA — a 13-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $1,741 for Bellevue, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Spokane Valley, WA at $259 per resident and in Bellevue, WA at $3,103.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Spokane Valley, WA at 34% of total revenue, whereas Bellevue, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 34%.
Summary
Bellevue spends 76.9% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($16,968/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $201 | $1,441 |
| Sales Tax | $17 | $1,282 |
| Income Tax | $26 | $50 |
| Intergovernmental | $100 | $8,407 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $5,003 |
| Other | $421 | $8,143 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $169 | $162 |
| Fire Protection | $189 | $966 |
| Highways & Roads | $112 | $80 |
| Public Welfare | $784 | $1,774 |
| Hospitals | $221 | $2,517 |
| Parks & Recreation | $259 | $3,103 |
| Housing | $2,595 | $3,270 |
| Sewerage | $43 | $199 |
| Utilities | $31 | $3,441 |
| Other | $695 | $6,553 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.