Bellevue, WA vs Spokane Valley, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Bellevue, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $22,065 versus $5,097, a 333% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 68/100 (grade B) against 55/100 (grade C) for Bellevue, WA — a 13-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $1,741 for Bellevue, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Bellevue, WA at $3,103 per resident and in Spokane Valley, WA at $259.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Bellevue, WA at 34% of total revenue, whereas Spokane Valley, WA relies most on other revenue at 34%.
Summary
Bellevue spends 332.9% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($16,968/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,441 | $201 |
| Sales Tax | $1,282 | $17 |
| Income Tax | $50 | $26 |
| Intergovernmental | $8,407 | $100 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,003 | $0 |
| Other | $8,143 | $421 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $162 | $169 |
| Fire Protection | $966 | $189 |
| Highways & Roads | $80 | $112 |
| Public Welfare | $1,774 | $784 |
| Hospitals | $2,517 | $221 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,103 | $259 |
| Housing | $3,270 | $2,595 |
| Sewerage | $199 | $43 |
| Utilities | $3,441 | $31 |
| Other | $6,553 | $695 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.