Southaven, MS vs Gulfport, MS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Gulfport spends 90.6% more per capita than Southaven ($105,191/person difference). Southaven, MS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $552 | $396 |
| Income Tax | $559 | $703 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,821 | $20 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,246 | $1,116 |
| Other | $1,581 | $3,854 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $123 | $530 |
| Highways & Roads | $384 | $54 |
| Public Welfare | $481 | $1,302 |
| Health | $55 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $35 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,286 | $1,250 |
| Housing | $2,918 | $2,549 |
| Utilities | $1,878 | $1,385 |
| General Admin | $0 | $105,813 |
| Other | $3,834 | $3,231 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.