Gulfport, MS vs Southaven, MS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Gulfport spends 959.9% more per capita than Southaven ($105,191/person difference). Southaven, MS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $396 | $552 |
| Income Tax | $703 | $559 |
| Intergovernmental | $20 | $1,821 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,116 | $1,246 |
| Other | $3,854 | $1,581 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $530 | $123 |
| Highways & Roads | $54 | $384 |
| Public Welfare | $1,302 | $481 |
| Health | $0 | $55 |
| Hospitals | $35 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,250 | $1,286 |
| Housing | $2,549 | $2,918 |
| Utilities | $1,385 | $1,878 |
| General Admin | $105,813 | $0 |
| Other | $3,231 | $3,834 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.