Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

South Jordan, UT vs Layton, UT

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

South Jordan spends 29.8% more per capita than Layton ($2,384/person difference). South Jordan, UT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
South Jordan, UT
Pop. 78,118
B
65/100
Budget Balance79
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Layton, UT
Pop. 81,726
C
55/100
Budget Balance0
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
South Jordan
Layton
Total Spending
$811.8M
$654.5M
Spending / Capita
$10,392
$8,008
Total Revenue
$842.1M
$5.5M
Revenue / Capita
$10,780
$67
Total Debt
$67.5M
$19.5M
Debt / Capita
$864
$238
Population
78,118
81,726
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
South Jordan$330
Layton$68
Highways & Roads
South Jordan$154
Layton$71
Parks & Recreation
South Jordan$607
Layton$799
Education
South Jordan$35
Layton$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

South JordanLayton
Property Tax
$57
$0
Sales Tax
$243
$91
Income Tax
$675
$606
Intergovernmental
$126
$67
Charges & Fees
$2,895
$1,740
Other
$1,297
$2,929

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

South JordanLayton
Fire Protection
$330
$68
Highways & Roads
$154
$71
Education
$35
$0
Public Welfare
$492
$627
Hospitals
$1,190
$300
Parks & Recreation
$607
$799
Housing
$1,101
$2,252
Sewerage
$191
$58
Utilities
$1,767
$1,194
Other
$4,524
$2,639
B
South Jordan, UT
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health
C
Layton, UT
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities