Layton, UT vs South Jordan, UT
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
South Jordan, UT spends 30% more per resident than Layton, UT: $10,392 against $8,008. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
South Jordan, UT holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 55/100 (grade C) for Layton, UT — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Layton, UT carries the lighter load at $238 per resident versus $864 for South Jordan, UT. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Layton, UT at $799 per resident and in South Jordan, UT at $607.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Layton, UT at 4358% of total revenue, whereas South Jordan, UT relies most on charges and fees at 27%.
Summary
South Jordan spends 22.9% more per capita than Layton ($2,384/person difference). South Jordan, UT has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $57 |
| Sales Tax | $91 | $243 |
| Income Tax | $606 | $675 |
| Intergovernmental | $67 | $126 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,740 | $2,895 |
| Other | $2,929 | $1,297 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $68 | $330 |
| Highways & Roads | $71 | $154 |
| Education | $0 | $35 |
| Public Welfare | $627 | $492 |
| Hospitals | $300 | $1,190 |
| Parks & Recreation | $799 | $607 |
| Housing | $2,252 | $1,101 |
| Sewerage | $58 | $191 |
| Utilities | $1,194 | $1,767 |
| Other | $2,639 | $4,524 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.