Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Seattle, WA vs Omaha, NE

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Seattle spends 208.2% more per capita than Omaha ($23,282/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Seattle, WA
Pop. 734,603
C
61/100
Budget Balance69
Debt Burden50
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Omaha, NE
Pop. 489,201
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Seattle
Omaha
Total Spending
$25.3B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$34,463
$11,180
Total Revenue
$56.5B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$76,958
$26,929
Total Debt
$808.1M
$0
Debt / Capita
$1,100
$0
Population
734,603
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Seattle$210
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Seattle$0
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Seattle$3,923
Omaha$742
Education
Seattle$1,461
Omaha$0
Health
Seattle$1,131
Omaha$456

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

SeattleOmaha
Property Tax
$1,831
$624
Sales Tax
$1,094
$373
Income Tax
$3,496
$0
Intergovernmental
$9,846
$2,622
Charges & Fees
$3,960
$0
Other
$8,544
$4,672

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

SeattleOmaha
Fire Protection
$210
$0
Highways & Roads
$0
$319
Education
$1,461
$0
Public Welfare
$3,439
$1,521
Health
$1,131
$456
Hospitals
$1,871
$0
Parks & Recreation
$3,923
$742
Housing
$3,727
$3,045
Sewerage
$952
$0
Utilities
$6,489
$581
Other
$11,260
$4,516
C
Seattle, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health

Compare More Cities