Omaha, NE vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Seattle spends 67.6% more per capita than Omaha ($23,282/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
C
61/100
Budget Balance69
Debt Burden50
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Omaha
Seattle
Total Spending
$5.5B
$25.3B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$34,463
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$56.5B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$76,958
Total Debt
$0
$808.1M
Debt / Capita
$0
$1,100
Population
489,201
734,603
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Seattle$210
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Seattle$0
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Seattle$3,923
Education
Omaha$0
Seattle$1,461
Health
Omaha$456
Seattle$1,131
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaSeattle
| Property Tax | $624 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,960 |
| Other | $4,672 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaSeattle
| Fire Protection | $0 | $210 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $3,439 |
| Health | $456 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $952 |
| Utilities | $581 | $6,489 |
| Other | $4,516 | $11,260 |
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Seattle, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health