Seattle, WA vs Milwaukee, WI
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Milwaukee, WI by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $19,417, a 77% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Milwaukee, WI edges Seattle, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 62/100 (grade C) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Milwaukee, WI reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Seattle, WA carries $1,100 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Seattle, WA leads with parks and recreation at $3,923 per resident, while Milwaukee, WI leads with police at $3,642.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Seattle, WA at 13% of total revenue, whereas Milwaukee, WI relies most on sales tax at 59%.
Summary
Seattle spends 77.5% more per capita than Milwaukee ($15,045/person difference). Milwaukee, WI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,831 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $1,094 | $6,548 |
| Income Tax | $3,496 | $1 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,846 | $1,231 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,960 | $0 |
| Other | $8,544 | $3,984 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,642 |
| Fire Protection | $210 | $802 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $23 |
| Education | $1,461 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,439 | $180 |
| Health | $1,131 | $1 |
| Hospitals | $1,871 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,923 | $2,206 |
| Housing | $3,727 | $1,071 |
| Sewerage | $952 | $0 |
| Utilities | $6,489 | $1,866 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,608 |
| Other | $11,260 | $8,018 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.