Milwaukee, WI vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Milwaukee, WI by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $19,417, a 77% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Milwaukee, WI edges Seattle, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 62/100 (grade C) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Milwaukee, WI reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Seattle, WA carries $1,100 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Milwaukee, WI leads with police at $3,642 per resident, while Seattle, WA leads with parks and recreation at $3,923.
They also fund themselves differently: sales tax is the largest single revenue source in Milwaukee, WI at 59% of total revenue, whereas Seattle, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 13%.
Summary
Seattle spends 43.7% more per capita than Milwaukee ($15,045/person difference). Milwaukee, WI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $6,548 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $1 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,231 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,960 |
| Other | $3,984 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,642 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $802 | $210 |
| Highways & Roads | $23 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $180 | $3,439 |
| Health | $1 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,206 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $1,071 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $952 |
| Utilities | $1,866 | $6,489 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,608 | $0 |
| Other | $8,018 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.