Seattle, WA vs Kent, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Kent, WA by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $10,491, a 228% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Seattle, WA edges Kent, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 61/100 (grade C) to 57/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Kent, WA carries the lighter load at $905 per resident versus $1,100 for Seattle, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Seattle, WA at $3,923 per resident and in Kent, WA at $1,448.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Seattle, WA at 13% of total revenue, whereas Kent, WA relies most on other revenue at 49%.
Summary
Seattle spends 228.5% more per capita than Kent ($23,971/person difference). Seattle, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,831 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $1,094 | $272 |
| Income Tax | $3,496 | $89 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,846 | $1,884 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,960 | $1,797 |
| Other | $8,544 | $4,935 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $413 |
| Fire Protection | $210 | $292 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | -$10 |
| Education | $1,461 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,439 | $850 |
| Health | $1,131 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,871 | $207 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,923 | $1,448 |
| Housing | $3,727 | $3,476 |
| Sewerage | $952 | $36 |
| Utilities | $6,489 | $1,474 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1 |
| Other | $11,260 | $2,306 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.