Kent, WA vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Seattle spends 69.6% more per capita than Kent ($23,971/person difference). Seattle, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $272 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $89 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,884 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,797 | $3,960 |
| Other | $4,935 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $413 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $292 | $210 |
| Highways & Roads | -$10 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $850 | $3,439 |
| Health | $0 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $207 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,448 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $3,476 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $36 | $952 |
| Utilities | $1,474 | $6,489 |
| Interest on Debt | $1 | $0 |
| Other | $2,306 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.