Seattle, WA vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA spends 26% more per resident than Seattle, WA: $43,387 against $34,463. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Seattle, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 61/100 (grade C) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 11-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Seattle, WA carries $1,100 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Seattle, WA leads with parks and recreation at $3,923 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Seattle, WA at 13% of total revenue, whereas Fresno, CA relies most on other revenue at 19%.
Summary
Fresno spends 20.6% more per capita than Seattle ($8,925/person difference). Seattle, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,831 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $1,094 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $3,496 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,846 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,960 | $11 |
| Other | $8,544 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $210 | $568 |
| Education | $1,461 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $3,439 | $1,946 |
| Health | $1,131 | $599 |
| Hospitals | $1,871 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,923 | $76 |
| Housing | $3,727 | $2,856 |
| Sewerage | $952 | $0 |
| Utilities | $6,489 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $255 |
| Other | $11,260 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.