Fresno, CA vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Fresno spends 25.9% more per capita than Seattle ($8,925/person difference). Seattle, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $337 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $19 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $501 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | -$4,470 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $11 | $3,960 |
| Other | $2,070 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,261 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $568 | $210 |
| Education | $3,942 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $1,946 | $3,439 |
| Health | $599 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $76 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $2,856 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $952 |
| Utilities | $15,340 | $6,489 |
| Interest on Debt | $255 | $0 |
| Other | $14,545 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.