Seattle, WA vs Everett, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA spends 30% more per resident than Everett, WA: $34,463 against $26,447. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Everett, WA edges Seattle, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 67/100 (grade B) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Everett, WA carries the lighter load at $141 per resident versus $1,100 for Seattle, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Seattle, WA leads with parks and recreation at $3,923 per resident, while Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Seattle, WA at 13% of total revenue, whereas Everett, WA relies most on other revenue at 24%.
Summary
Seattle spends 30.3% more per capita than Everett ($8,015/person difference). Everett, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,831 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $1,094 | $362 |
| Income Tax | $3,496 | $235 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,846 | $4,248 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,960 | $4,469 |
| Other | $8,544 | $6,125 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $290 |
| Fire Protection | $210 | $1,790 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $251 |
| Education | $1,461 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,439 | $714 |
| Health | $1,131 | $379 |
| Hospitals | $1,871 | $284 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,923 | $1,098 |
| Housing | $3,727 | $3,492 |
| Sewerage | $952 | $268 |
| Utilities | $6,489 | $6,827 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,198 |
| Other | $11,260 | $8,856 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.