Everett, WA vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA spends 30% more per resident than Everett, WA: $34,463 against $26,447. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Everett, WA edges Seattle, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 67/100 (grade B) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Everett, WA carries the lighter load at $141 per resident versus $1,100 for Seattle, WA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790 per resident, while Seattle, WA leads with parks and recreation at $3,923.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Everett, WA at 24% of total revenue, whereas Seattle, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 13%.
Summary
Seattle spends 23.3% more per capita than Everett ($8,015/person difference). Everett, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $362 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $235 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,248 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,469 | $3,960 |
| Other | $6,125 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $290 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,790 | $210 |
| Highways & Roads | $251 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $714 | $3,439 |
| Health | $379 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $284 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,098 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $3,492 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $268 | $952 |
| Utilities | $6,827 | $6,489 |
| Interest on Debt | $2,198 | $0 |
| Other | $8,856 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.