Scottsdale, AZ vs Gilbert, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Gilbert, AZ outspends Scottsdale, AZ by a wide margin per resident — $11,239 versus $21, a 52314% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Scottsdale, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 60/100 (grade C) for Gilbert, AZ — a 30-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Scottsdale, AZ carries the lighter load at $2 per resident versus $1,867 for Gilbert, AZ. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Scottsdale, AZ at $2 per resident and in Gilbert, AZ at $1,066.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Scottsdale, AZ at 13% of total revenue, whereas Gilbert, AZ relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Gilbert spends 99.8% more per capita than Scottsdale ($11,218/person difference). Scottsdale, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $2 |
| Sales Tax | $1 | $244 |
| Income Tax | $1 | $1,096 |
| Intergovernmental | $4 | $35,750 |
| Charges & Fees | $5 | $2,411 |
| Other | $4 | $1,553 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $39 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $133 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $191 |
| Public Welfare | $1 | $955 |
| Health | $0 | $142 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $29 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2 | $1,066 |
| Housing | $5 | $2,707 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $208 |
| Utilities | $4 | $2,287 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $25 |
| Other | $8 | $3,455 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.