Gilbert, AZ vs Scottsdale, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Gilbert spends 52313.8% more per capita than Scottsdale ($11,218/person difference). Scottsdale, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $2 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $244 | $1 |
| Income Tax | $1,096 | $1 |
| Intergovernmental | $35,750 | $4 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,411 | $5 |
| Other | $1,553 | $4 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $39 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $133 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $191 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $955 | $1 |
| Health | $142 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $29 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,066 | $2 |
| Housing | $2,707 | $5 |
| Sewerage | $208 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,287 | $4 |
| Interest on Debt | $25 | $0 |
| Other | $3,455 | $8 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.