Scottsdale, AZ vs Chandler, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Chandler spends 99.9% more per capita than Scottsdale ($14,789/person difference). Scottsdale, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1 | $90 |
| Income Tax | $1 | $669 |
| Intergovernmental | $4 | $10,136 |
| Charges & Fees | $5 | $1,938 |
| Other | $4 | $3,477 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $260 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $306 |
| Public Welfare | $1 | $670 |
| Health | $0 | $243 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $374 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2 | $899 |
| Housing | $5 | $3,286 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $0 |
| Utilities | $4 | $2,461 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $88 |
| Other | $8 | $6,223 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.