Chandler, AZ vs Scottsdale, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Chandler, AZ outspends Scottsdale, AZ by a wide margin per resident — $14,811 versus $21, a 68968% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Scottsdale, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 59/100 (grade C) for Chandler, AZ — a 31-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Scottsdale, AZ carries the lighter load at $2 per resident versus $10 for Chandler, AZ. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Chandler, AZ at $899 per resident and in Scottsdale, AZ at $2.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Chandler, AZ at 100% of total revenue, whereas Scottsdale, AZ relies most on charges and fees at 13%.
Summary
Chandler spends 68967.6% more per capita than Scottsdale ($14,789/person difference). Scottsdale, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $90 | $1 |
| Income Tax | $669 | $1 |
| Intergovernmental | $10,136 | $4 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,938 | $5 |
| Other | $3,477 | $4 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $260 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $306 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $670 | $1 |
| Health | $243 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $374 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $899 | $2 |
| Housing | $3,286 | $5 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,461 | $4 |
| Interest on Debt | $88 | $0 |
| Other | $6,223 | $8 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.