San Jose, CA vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN spends 22% more per resident than San Jose, CA: $21,910 against $17,934. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Minneapolis, MN — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Jose, CA at $1,424 per resident and in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 9% of total revenue in San Jose, CA and 17% in Minneapolis, MN.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 18.1% more per capita than San Jose ($3,975/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $40 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $315 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $1,935 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,680 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $608 | $2,040 |
| Other | $3,519 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $810 | $1,500 |
| Health | $609 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,254 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,424 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $4,897 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $161 | $570 |
| Utilities | $2,533 | $2,398 |
| Other | $6,247 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.