Minneapolis, MN vs San Jose, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Minneapolis spends 22.2% more per capita than San Jose ($3,975/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
B
65/100
Budget Balance17
Debt Burden91
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency80
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency98
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Minneapolis
San Jose
Total Spending
$9.4B
$18.0B
Spending / Capita
$21,910
$17,934
Total Revenue
$8.2B
$38.1B
Revenue / Capita
$19,159
$38,091
Total Debt
$274.8M
$0
Debt / Capita
$644
$0
Population
426,877
1,001,176
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Minneapolis$683
San Jose$0
Highways & Roads
Minneapolis$221
San Jose$0
Parks & Recreation
Minneapolis$3,486
San Jose$1,424
Health
Minneapolis$0
San Jose$609
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
MinneapolisSan Jose
| Property Tax | $0 | $40 |
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $315 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $1,935 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $2,680 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $608 |
| Other | $3,254 | $3,519 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
MinneapolisSan Jose
| Fire Protection | $683 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $810 |
| Health | $0 | $609 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,254 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $1,424 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $4,897 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $161 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $2,533 |
| Other | $8,919 | $6,247 |
B
Minneapolis, MN
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health
A
San Jose, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health