Minneapolis, MN vs San Jose, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN spends 22% more per resident than San Jose, CA: $21,910 against $17,934. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Minneapolis, MN — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486 per resident and in San Jose, CA at $1,424.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 17% of total revenue in Minneapolis, MN and 9% in San Jose, CA.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 22.2% more per capita than San Jose ($3,975/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $40 |
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $315 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $1,935 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $2,680 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $608 |
| Other | $3,254 | $3,519 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $683 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $810 |
| Health | $0 | $609 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,254 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $1,424 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $4,897 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $161 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $2,533 |
| Other | $8,919 | $6,247 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.