San Jose, CA vs Mesa, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA spends 40% more per resident than Mesa, AZ: $17,934 against $12,768. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
On the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score the two are level: San Jose, CA and Mesa, AZ both land at 90/100 (grade A and A respectively), so the deciding factors sit in the underlying six-factor breakdown rather than the rolled-up grade.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mesa, AZ carries $469 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Jose, CA at $1,424 per resident and in Mesa, AZ at $953.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in San Jose, CA at 9% of total revenue, whereas Mesa, AZ relies most on charges and fees at 9%.
Summary
San Jose spends 40.5% more per capita than Mesa ($5,166/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $40 | $47 |
| Sales Tax | $315 | $463 |
| Income Tax | $1,935 | $1,376 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,680 | $1,383 |
| Charges & Fees | $608 | $3,334 |
| Other | $3,519 | $2,253 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $422 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $192 |
| Public Welfare | $810 | $829 |
| Health | $609 | $147 |
| Hospitals | $1,254 | $537 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,424 | $953 |
| Housing | $4,897 | $4,190 |
| Sewerage | $161 | $38 |
| Utilities | $2,533 | $2,376 |
| Other | $6,247 | $3,082 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.