Mesa, AZ vs San Jose, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA spends 40% more per resident than Mesa, AZ: $17,934 against $12,768. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
On the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score the two are level: Mesa, AZ and San Jose, CA both land at 90/100 (grade A and A respectively), so the deciding factors sit in the underlying six-factor breakdown rather than the rolled-up grade.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mesa, AZ carries $469 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Mesa, AZ at $953 per resident and in San Jose, CA at $1,424.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Mesa, AZ at 9% of total revenue, whereas San Jose, CA relies most on other revenue at 9%.
Summary
San Jose spends 28.8% more per capita than Mesa ($5,166/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $47 | $40 |
| Sales Tax | $463 | $315 |
| Income Tax | $1,376 | $1,935 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,383 | $2,680 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,334 | $608 |
| Other | $2,253 | $3,519 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $422 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $192 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $829 | $810 |
| Health | $147 | $609 |
| Hospitals | $537 | $1,254 |
| Parks & Recreation | $953 | $1,424 |
| Housing | $4,190 | $4,897 |
| Sewerage | $38 | $161 |
| Utilities | $2,376 | $2,533 |
| Other | $3,082 | $6,247 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.