San Jose, CA vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA spends 36% more per resident than Colorado Springs, CO: $17,934 against $13,222. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 59/100 (grade C) for Colorado Springs, CO — a 31-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: San Jose, CA leads with parks and recreation at $1,424 per resident, while Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in San Jose, CA at 9% of total revenue, whereas Colorado Springs, CO relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 13%.
Summary
San Jose spends 35.6% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($4,712/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $40 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $315 | $257 |
| Income Tax | $1,935 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,680 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $608 | $5,676 |
| Other | $3,519 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $1,266 |
| Public Welfare | $810 | $575 |
| Health | $609 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,254 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,424 | $376 |
| Housing | $4,897 | $2,713 |
| Sewerage | $161 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,533 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $190 |
| Other | $6,247 | $5,120 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.